Read Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law

Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law

Dana Baldinger

4.9/5 (22915 ratings)

Description:This book explores what both international and EU law require from a national asylum judge with regard to the intensity of the judicial scrutiny, and with regard to evidentiary issues, such as: the standard and burden of proof * the assessment of credibility * the required level of individualization * the admission and evaluation of evidence * opportunities for presenting evidence * time limits for submitting evidence. To that end, an analysis is made of the provisions on national (judicial) proceedings and a number of secondary EU law instruments. The book's research has revealed that international and EU laws contain many specific standards on the intensity of judicial scrutiny to be applied by national asylum courts, as well as standards on evidence. It has also revealed that it has become, in fact, impossible for national asylum courts to ignore or discard these standards, as that would amount to a breach of Articles 18, 19, and 47 of the EU Charter on fundamental rights and thus a violation of primary binding EU law. An important common denominator following from international and EU law is that national asylum courts must perform an independent, impartial, and rigorous national judicial scrutiny of asylum refusals. This scrutiny implies, inter alia, that national courts examine evidence submitted by applicants in a careful and serious manner. It also requires that national courts are able to make an independent and fresh determination of the disputed facts and that - if necessary in order to clarify the facts - these courts undertake judicial investigations.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law. To get started finding Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Pages: 508

Format: PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition

Publisher: Wolf Legal Publishers

Release: 2013

ISBN: 9058509524

Description: This book explores what both international and EU law require from a national asylum judge with regard to the intensity of the judicial scrutiny, and with regard to evidentiary issues, such as: the standard and burden of proof * the assessment of credibility * the required level of individualization * the admission and evaluation of evidence * opportunities for presenting evidence * time limits for submitting evidence. To that end, an analysis is made of the provisions on national (judicial) proceedings and a number of secondary EU law instruments. The book's research has revealed that international and EU laws contain many specific standards on the intensity of judicial scrutiny to be applied by national asylum courts, as well as standards on evidence. It has also revealed that it has become, in fact, impossible for national asylum courts to ignore or discard these standards, as that would amount to a breach of Articles 18, 19, and 47 of the EU Charter on fundamental rights and thus a violation of primary binding EU law. An important common denominator following from international and EU law is that national asylum courts must perform an independent, impartial, and rigorous national judicial scrutiny of asylum refusals. This scrutiny implies, inter alia, that national courts examine evidence submitted by applicants in a careful and serious manner. It also requires that national courts are able to make an independent and fresh determination of the disputed facts and that - if necessary in order to clarify the facts - these courts undertake judicial investigations.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law. To get started finding Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Special Offer | $0.00

Special Offer! | $0.00

Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law

Rigorous Scrutiny versus Marginal Review: Standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in International and European Asylum Law

More Books

Vertical Judicial Dialogues in Asylum Cases (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe) by Dana Baldinger (2015-04-30)

Vertical Judicial Dialogues in Asylum Cases (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe) by Dana Baldinger (2015-04-30)

Vertical Judicial Dialogues in Asylum Cases: Standards on Judicial Scrutiny and Evidence in International and European Asylum Law (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe, 36)

Vertical Judicial Dialogues in Asylum Cases: Standards on Judicial Scrutiny and Evidence in International and European Asylum Law (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe, 36)